End Plastics
Turning the Tide on Plastic Pollution: The Recycling Refund & Litter Reduction Act of 2025
April 11, 2025
In the heart of our nation’s capital, a transformative initiative is underway – The Recycling Refund and Litter Reduction Amendment Act of 2025, colloquially known as the “Bottle Bill.”
Introduced on January 15, 2025, by Councilmember Brianne K. Nadeau and co-sponsored by ten other councilmembers, this legislation aims to transform Washington, D.C.’s approach to waste management. But it has several more stages to go before it is hopefully passed. On April 12th, the DC Environmental Network will be passing out leaflets with more information on the Bill at Eastern Market Metro in Washington, D.C, so this is a good moment to talk about it!
Washington, D.C. is a city that is grappling with a significant trash problem, particularly concerning soda cans and bottles – so it needs this legislation. Plastic bottles alone constitute 60% of the weight of all trash retrieved from the Anacostia River. Plastic pollution not only tarnishes the beauty of our capital city, but it poses severe threats to wildlife as well. Moreover, plastic degrades into microplastics, tiny fragments no bigger than a grain of rice that are associated with a range of human health impacts too.
What is the Essence of the Bill?
At its core, the Bottle Bill proposes consumers pay a refundable ten-cent deposit on plastic, glass, and aluminum beverage bottles at the point of purchase. Upon returning them, consumers can reclaim their deposit.
This system is intended to incentivize recycling and foster a system of corporate responsibility by creating a financial value for waste. The bill would lead to higher recycling rates, less trash in public spaces, and higher-quality recycled material because returned bottles from deposit systems are cleaner and better sorted, avoiding contamination from roadside recycling bins. This makes the plastic suitable for bottle-to-bottle recycling rather than being downcycled or landfilled.
Plus, recycling bottles can now be easier than ever. The bill mandates the creation of accessible redemption centers and certain retailers may be required to serve as redemption points. Modern designated redemption centers or retailers use automated reverse vending machines (RVMs) to reclaim their deposits. These machines read barcodes, compact bottles, and cans for efficiency and provide instant refunds via digital wallets or printed slips.
But what’s best about this bill is that it gives the industry more responsibility to manage the end-of-life stage of their products. Beverage companies, including producers, distributors, and retailers, would have to add a refundable deposit to every eligible container sold in DC. Beverage companies would also be required to register with the programs administrative body, regularly reporting on the number of containers sold and returned, and managing the flow of deposit funds, including the collection and reimbursement processes.
Would This Bill Work?
The Bottle Bill is designed to tackle this crisis head-on by providing a financial incentive for consumers to return their bottles and cans rather than just discarding them irresponsibly. Unlike the District’s five-cent bag fee, the deposit payable under the Bottle Bill is fully refundable, upon returning the bottle or can. In fact, anyone can return littered containers and claim the deposit, providing a financial incentive for cleaning up the city!
“Some members of the public believe a deposit-return law is an untried idea. The truth is that bottle bills have existed in ten U.S. states for decades and are a proven solution to bottle and can pollution. D.C.’s bill builds on the best practices and lessons learned from these programs” says Susan Schorr, co-lead of the Return, Refund, Recycle Coalition for DC & Chair of the Zero Waste Committee, Sierra Club DC Chapter.
The efficacy of bottle deposit programs is well-documented. States with similar legislation have witnessed remarkable outcomes. For instance, Michigan boasts a return rate of 73%, while Maine achieves 77%. These programs have not only elevated recycling rates but also substantially reduced litter, leading to cleaner communities and healthier ecosystems.
Opposition from the Beverage and Plastics Industries
Opponents claim, with no evidence, that the Bottle Bill will increase costs. However, a government study shows that prices for beverages in bottle bill and non-bottle bill states are comparable—and sometimes lower in bottle bill states. Additionally, small businesses (under 2,000 square feet of retail space) and sit-down restaurants are exempt from accepting returned containers.
The American Beverage Association has started distributing flyers claiming that the ten-cent deposit will increase every year. According to Chris Weiss, co-lead of the Return, Refund, Recycle Coalition for DC & Executive Director, DC Environmental Network – that’s just not true. The Act allows deposit increases only after five years and only if beverage companies fail to meet their obligations for two consecutive years.
Another tactic used by opponents is to highlight the upfront deposit cost while omitting the most important part—the deposit refund. They emphasize that a 24-pack of beer will require an additional $2.40 at checkout, but fail to mention that consumers will get that money back when they return their empty cans or bottles. This misinformation is a deliberate attempt to stir public opposition, but facts prove otherwise: bottle bills benefit consumers, businesses, and the environment alike.
Historically, beverage companies have spent millions of dollars to defeat bottle bill legislation. Their resistance stems from a desire to avoid responsibility for their single-use packaging choices, preferring that residents and local governments bear the financial and health burden of recycling and waste management.
By shifting the financial responsibility back onto producers, the Bottle Bill promotes corporate accountability.
Financial Benefits for Local Government and Taxpayers
One of the strongest arguments for the Bottle Bill is its financial benefits. The program will be funded by beverage companies, reducing the burden on local taxpayers. By diverting bottles and cans containers from the municipal recycling stream and bringing them to designated deposit areas, the District will lower the costs of curbside recycling, as the city pays contractors by weight.
Additionally, less trash means reduced spending on cleanup efforts, leading to cleaner neighborhoods, parks, and waterways. With the District facing serious budget challenges, this is an initiative that not only pays for itself but also generates savings.
Concerns about logistical challenges for small retailers and potential impacts on low-income residents have been carefully addressed. The legislation exempts small retailers, restaurants, bars, and hotels from mandatory participation, preventing undue burdens. Similar programs in other states have led to the emergence of grassroots recycling initiatives, job creation in waste management, and additional revenue streams for individuals who collect and return bottles and cans.
A Vision for a Sustainable Future
The fate of each returned bottle still depends largely on the material it is made from. Not every bottle ends up recycled into a new bottle. Only 43% of aluminum, 31% of glass, and 5% of plastics are recycled in the United States. Most plastics will unfortunately still end up downcycled, burned in waste-to-energy plants, or exported but states with bottle bills do have recycling rates 2-3 times higher than those without.
But while the DC Bottle Bill is a tool, not a silver bullet, it is certainly a step in the right direction. For now, the bill has been referred to the Committee on Business and Economic Development until July 14th 2025, and then to the Committee on Transportation and the Environment. Let’s hope it passes.
You can also visit EARTH DAY.ORG’s End Plastic Initiatives website for free facts sheets and information and to learn more about plastics, their impacts on our health, and how you can take action to minimize it.
This article is available for republishing on your website, newsletter, magazine, newspaper, or blog. The accompanying imagery is also cleared for use. Please ensure that the author’s name and their affiliation with EARTHDAY.ORG are credited. Kindly inform us if you republish so we can acknowledge, tag, or repost your content. You may notify us via email at [email protected] or [email protected].
